Posted on

California bankruptcy court rules against MERS

GSEs release guidance on HARP changes In October 2011, the federal housing finance agency (fhfa) announced changes to the Home Affordable Refinance Program (HARP). The stated goal of these changes is to increase the number of "underwater" borrowers[1] eligible to refinance their home mortgages while reducing credit risk for the.Gallup: Americans not as optimistic about homeownership At the start of 2019, Americans' optimism about their personal finances reached levels not seen in more than 16 years, Americans remain least concerned about being able to pay their housing costs (30%) and making the.

CALIFORNIA BANKRUPTCY COURT HOLDS THAT MERS CANNOT TRANSFER NOTE FOR WANT OF OWNERSHIP; CITES BOYKO, LANDMARK (KANSAS), LAMY, AND vargas cases. kesler (kansas decision as to lack of authority of MERS), LaSalle Bank v. Lamy (New York), and In Re Foreclosure Cases (the "Boyko" decision from Ohio Federal Court).

Those holding claims against companies are asked to vote on proposed bankruptcy plans. Objecting to Honeywell’s request is the trustee of CFB’s trust and the pittsburgh asbestos firm goldberg, Persky.

CoreLogic: July home prices increase 3.8%  · U.S. home-sale prices edged up again in May, growing 3.6 percent from a year ago to a median of $315,700 across the metros Redfin tracks. While this was the biggest annual home price increase in seven months, it fell far short of the 7.1 percent growth rate of a year earlier.

In an opinion by Justice Joan Irion, the court ruled in favor of MERS in two ways: (1) California’s nonjudicial foreclosure statutes did not expressly or impliedly allow a lawsuit simply to determine whether the party initiating a foreclosure was authorized to do so; and (2) even if they did, the plaintiff consented to the use of MERS to initiate the foreclosure when he signed the deed of trust.

“As a Supreme Court justice, Justice Kavanaugh is not a judge subject to the act.” Federal law and rules for judicial misconduct, the committee said, “unequivocally preclude review of the merits of.

Violation of SB94 and advance fees rule in California In Re: Walker, Case No. 10-21656-E-11 – Eastern District of CA bankruptcy court rules mers has NO actionable interest in title. "Any attempt to transfer the beneficial interest of a trust deed without ownership of the underlying note is void under California law." "MERS could not, as a matter of law, have transferred the note to.

Kodak asked Gropper to rule in its. filed counterclaims against Kodak, saying Kodak is claiming Apple’s technology as its own. The Cupertino, California-based company sought to transfer the Kodak.

The most important dimension of this filing is that it shields the city from lawsuits that are being filed against it. Already Detroit. and whether seeking the protection of the federal bankruptcy.

California judge rules MERS can’t foreclose. This is the chance you’ve been waiting for.!!!!! If you want to save, keep or get your house back (if you’re in foreclosure, eviction, trustee sale or evicted from your home). Read about the entity that foreclosed millions homes in USA. MERS is FRAUD.